Blog - For The Record — NYC Department of Records & Information Services

New York City

Building Histories, The Bellevue Psychopathic Hospital and the Rivington Street Bath

In last week’s blog, Amy Stecher adapted her “Lunch and Learn” presentation about the Manhattan Building Plan collection project. This week, co-presenter Alexandra Hilton highlights two architecturally significant buildings documented in the collection – the Bellevue Psychopathic Hospital and the Rivington Street Bath. Future blogs will feature the plans of other unique buildings that have been identified in the processing project.


Bellevue Psychopathic Hospital

Psychopathic Building, Bellevue and Allied Hospitals, architects’ rendering, 1927. Department of Public Charities and Hospitals Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The Bellevue Psychopathic Hospital, as it was called at the time, was built in 1931 by Charles B. Meyers in the Italian Renaissance style. The building is still standing alongside the East River on First Avenue between 29th and 30th Streets, occupying an entire city block. When constructed, it joined the growing Bellevue hospital complex, and was intended to match the existing buildings, which were designed by architects McKim, Mead & White – same color brick, embellished with granite base course, limestone and terra cotta trimmings. By then, McKim, Mead & White was barely active; Meyers had just designed the Tammany Hall building and was a favorite of then-Mayor Jimmy Walker.

Manhattan Block 958. Bromley Atlas, 1955. New York Public Library.

Prior to its construction, Bellevue’s mental-health facilities were part of the main hospital and included an 1879 “pavilion for the insane,” and an alcoholic ward was added in 1892. Dr. Menas Gregory, a well-known psychiatrist who spent his career working in Bellevue’s psychiatric division, is credited with the idea for a psychiatric building after a trip to inspect similar institutions in Europe – a “Temple of Mental Health,” as he called it. Wanting to create a very clean and stately environment for the new hospital was right on brand for Dr. Gregory. In his position, he had already changed the terminology – preferring “psychopathic” to the word “insane,” thinking this would help make the patients seem curable. He had also removed the iron bars from the old pavilion’s windows and had lessened the use of narcotics and physical restraints on the patients. Dr. Gregory was seen as a good guy in the field, at a time when most medical professionals were largely ignorant about mental illness.

Psychopathic Hospital, Department of Hospitals, Charles B. Meyers, elevation, 1929, blueprint. Manhattan Building Plan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Before the hospital was built, The New York Times said it would be “one of the finest hospitals in the world for the treatment of mental disorders” and “thoroughly modern” at a cost of $3,000,000. (Unsurprisingly, by the time it was finished, the cost would be $4,300,000 ($66,000,000 today). It was designed as a single building with three separate units: 1) 10-stories to house administrative services, doctors’ offices, labs and a library; 2) 8-stories, for mild cases; 3) 8-stories, for more advanced cases. There were facilities for recreation and occupational therapy; physio-, electro- and hydro-therapy; an out-patient clinic; teaching facilities for medical students, and a special research clinic for the study and treatment of delinquency, crime and behavior problems, in collaboration with the Department of Correction, Criminal Courts and Probation Bureau.

Bellevue Hospital complex with new psychopathic building at right, October 31, 1934. Borough President Manhattan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Rooms were designed to house either one, two or three patients at a time. In a Mental Hygiene Bulletin, it was written that “special consideration has been given in the plans to incorporate within the building the appearance and aspect of home or normal living conditions with simple decorations and color tones believed to have the most soothing effect upon the patient.” One hundred of the six hundred beds were dedicated for the study and treatment of children, under the supervision of the Department of Education. 

Completing the building was nothing short of dramatic and filled with accusations of corruption and mismanagement. Its lavish exterior juxtaposed against the great depression couldn’t have been more tone deaf to the city’s residents. When ground was broken on June 18, 1930, it was thought the building would be completed at the end of 1931. Almost a year later, in February 1931, the cornerstone was just being laid. Delays were plentiful. It reportedly took a year to choose the architect and another year to draw the plans, and then, according to the Acting Commissioner of Hospitals, “after the contractor had collected all the funds he could get, he left for Europe.” 

Psychopathic Hospital, Department of Hospitals, Charles B. Meyers, first floor plan, 1929, blueprint. Manhattan Building Plan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Bellevue Psychopathic Hospital, Manhattan Block 958, Lot 1, 1940. Tax Photograph Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The hospital partially opened in May 1933 with the 600-bed facility only ready for 375 patients. A formal dedication occurred later that year in November, where tribute was paid to Dr. Gregory for his vision. Dr. Gregory resigned from his post in 1934, amid an investigation of his division by the Commissioner of Hospitals, Dr. S. S. Goldwater. This formed a spectacular tit-for-tat-type relationship between Dr. Gregory and Dr. Goldwater, which The New York Times covered extensively. Dr. Gregory died in 1941.

Over the years, the building went from temple of health to a scary place you didn’t want to go, and was the subject of many films, novels and exposes. The hospital saw many celebrity patients. Norman Mailer was sent there after stabbing his wife in a drunken rage. William Burroughs after he chopped off his own finger to impress someone. Eugene O’Neill had several stays in the alcoholic ward. Sylvia Plath came after a nervous breakdown. And infamous criminals like George Metesky the “Mad Bomber,” and John Lennon’s assassin, Mark David Chapman, were briefly committed to the hospital. 

In 1984, the city began transitioning the building into a homeless shelter and intake center, but much of it was left empty. Around 2008, a proposal to turn the building into a hotel surfaced. To developers, the building was naturally suited to such a use, given the H-shaped layout with long hallways and small rooms.


Rivington Baths

The Rivington Street Bath House at 326 Rivington Street, later renamed the Baruch Bath House, was the first in the city to be built with public funds. The ground-breaking for the bathhouse took place in December 1897; it opened on March 23, 1901. 

Public Bath Building, Rivington Street, Cady, Berg & See, South Elevation, 1897, ink on linen. Manhattan Building Plan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Architects Cady, Berg & See designed the large, neoclassical building. They had become the go-to designers for municipal bath houses after the success of the People’s Bath, a public bath that had been privately funded by the New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor (the AICP). The People’s Bath opened in 1891 at 9 Centre Market Place, near Broome Street, on the block where the old Police Headquarters building still stands. The architects and Dr. Simon Baruch, regarded as the “father of the public bath movement in the United States,” were keen on German design and their widespread use of showers – which, at the time, were referred to as rain baths or ring showers because of the circular shower head, designed to keep hair dry. The Germans were using showers for mass bathing situations, such as in military barracks. Showers were cheaper to build, easier to keep clean, used less water and could get people in and out faster, and became the staple of bathhouses.

Dr. Simon Baruch, who the Rivington Street Bathhouse was eventually named after, emigrated from Germany to South Carolina when he was a teenager. He studied medicine and joined the Civil War as a surgeon on the confederate side. Captured at the Battle of Gettysburg, he was held as a prisoner of war for the duration of the conflict. He made his way to New York City in 1881, served as a physician on the Lower East Side, and achieved prominence in the New York medical field.

Manhattan Block 324, 1891, Bromley Atlas, New York Public Library

Dr. Baruch began advocating for public bathhouses in 1889. He was big on hydrotherapy, at the time a new concept in the United States, and this guided many of his endeavors. Municipal officials weren’t as sold on this concept that poor sanitation would equal poor physical health, but Baruch was tireless in promoting the utility of water and importance of a public bath system. For some reason, he was in the minority – even though in 1894, only 306 out of 255,000 tenements in New York City had bathtubs. “The people won’t bathe,” said then-Mayor Hugh Grant. But by 1895, Baruch finally convinced the State Legislature to pass a law that mandated cities with a population greater than 50,000 to establish and maintain free bath facilities.

Logistics around the new bath law and facilitation of public bathhouses caused some lag. One of the hiccups concerned their locations. Tompkins Square Park on the Lower East Side, then a predominantly German and Irish neighborhood, had been chosen as the location for the first bath. The residents couldn’t have been less thrilled by this prospect.  They did not want to be living in the community thought to be so poor that they needed a public bath. Essentially, they said it should go to the newer Jewish and Italian immigrant communities, located further south. And they did not want the bathhouse to take away from their already too-little park space. Their opposition was heard; Tompkins Square was no longer a contender. There was also a question of whether public baths even had to be located in parks; the mayor and his committee on public baths thought it did; Baruch said they did not. Somehow, they came over to Baruch’s side and the spot on Rivington Street, already owned by the city, was chosen.

Public Bath Building, Rivington Street, Cady, Berg & See, First floor plan; showers and waiting area for men and women, 1897, ink on linen. Manhattan Building Plan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Public Bath Building, Rivington Street, Cady, Berg & See, Longitudinal section, baths on upper floors, 1897, ink on linen.  Manhattan Building Plan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. 

The style of the Rivington Street Bathhouse influenced the style of subsequently built baths in the city. William Paul Gerhard, author of Modern Baths and Bath Houses (1908), said that the exterior of a people’s bath – or public bath – should be easily recognizable so it would be easily found. But he also warned that it shouldn’t be so lavish that the poor wouldn’t want to come. The Rivington Street bath design wasn’t exactly modest and met criticism for its extravagance and cost—eventually totaling more than $95,000 ($2,995,000 in today’s dollars). Of course, after its immediate success, the AICP recommended that another 16 bathhouses be built to the same specifications, saying it was actually more economical to build (cost less per shower compartment) and to maintain for the long haul. They aimed for the ancient Roman public bath-look with classical pilasters, columns, arches and cornices, constructed with hefty materials like brick, terra cotta, stone marble and copper, and with ornamental iron work. Whatever its appearance, the bathing experience was pretty much the same throughout the city’s bathhouses. 

Public Bath Building, Rivington Street, Cady, Berg & See, Plumbing plan, 1897, ink on linen. Manhattan Building Plan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Public Bath Building, Rivington Street, Cady, Berg & See, Longitudinal section, 1897, ink on linen. Manhattan Building Plan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

At Rivington Street, the three-and-a-half story building was divided into two spaces for a dedicated men’s and women’s area, each with a waiting room. The men’s area was about 2/3 of the building with 45 rain baths, or, showers; the women had 22. A handful of bathtubs were on the upper floors. Each bath cubicle was divided into two parts – a dressing area and a shower, separated by a curtain. When a patron entered the bathhouse, they were given a number, and then they would wait for their number to be called for the next available cubicle. They usually had 20 minutes to undress, bathe and redress – Rivington had the capacity to accommodate 3,000 bathers per day on this timetable. Attendants controlled the water temperature, which ranged between 73 to 105 degrees F, and the duration of the shower – I’m sure it will come to no surprise to learn that the attendants soon began running a scheme, where patrons could sneak them five cents for a limitless bath time. Eventually they got caught and were fired. Pools were later added to the complex in 1917.

Rivington Street Bath, Manhattan Block 324, Lot 36, 1940 Tax Photograph Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Rivington Street Bath, Manhattan Block 324, Lot 36, 1940 Tax Photograph Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

In 1939, Bernard Baruch, Dr. Baruch’s son, donated the land around the bathhouse to the city, and jurisdiction of the building went to the Parks Department. They renovated the bathhouse as a recreation center and added Baruch Playground. In the 1950s, the New York City Housing Authority built Baruch Houses, Manhattan’s largest public housing complex adjacent to the bathhouse. By 1975, the city’s fiscal crisis forced the facility to close, and has pretty much sat unused

The Mayors of the Greater City of New York

Recent blogs have discussed how the increasing importance of the mayor within city government over the course of the 19th century is reflected in the volume and significance of mayoral records in the Municipal Archives.

This week we will focus on records of the mayors who served during the first two decades after creation of the Greater City of New York in 1898. From the Gilded Age to the Jazz Age, it was a period of massive immigration, revolutionary changes in technology, transportation, communication as well as the creation of the modem capitalist economy, several cycles of boom and bust, and a World War.

Prior to 1898, New York City consisted of only the Island of Manhattan and part of what later became the Borough of the Bronx. The push for annexation of Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island to New York City dated as far back as the late 1860s. Proponents of annexation saw that a centralized municipal government could facilitate the development of railroads, utilities and infrastructure necessary to maintain New York’s dominant role in the nation’s economy.

It took nearly thirty years to persuade voters in the areas to be annexed of the benefits of consolidation. Perhaps the most significant incentive was the realization that access to revenue from real estate taxes on the commercial areas of Manhattan could be used to fund needed infrastructure improvements throughout the region.

Finally, in 1894, voters in all areas to be affected approved a non-binding referendum on consolidation. A New York State commission issued a new charter for the greater city joining the formerly separate governments of Manhattan, Bronx Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island into a single entity. Voters approved the new city charter in 1897.

Disasters, national and local, often elicited action from the mayor’s office. The sinking of the Titanic in 1912 was a typical incident. The Mayor’s Office did establish a fund to aid victims of the disaster.   Telegram to Mayor Gaynor from the…

Disasters, national and local, often elicited action from the mayor’s office. The sinking of the Titanic in 1912 was a typical incident. The Mayor’s Office did establish a fund to aid victims of the disaster.  Telegram to Mayor Gaynor from the Lord Mayor of London, April 17, 1912. Mayor William Gaynor Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

In 1898, Mayor Robert Van Wyck became the first mayor of the new Greater City of New York. Beginning with Van Wyck, the records of each mayoral administration are organized in three key series: subject files, departmental files, and general correspondence. This scheme was maintained almost unchanged over the next century.

1920 Mayor Hylan solicited citizens to join a committee formed in response to concerns about motion-picture subject matter. Mayor John Hylan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

1920 Mayor Hylan solicited citizens to join a committee formed in response to concerns about motion-picture subject matter. Mayor John Hylan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Subject files were created for contemporary issues that the mayor and his staff designated as significant for that particular administration. They vary from mayor to mayor and correspond to events and concerns of their respective eras. For example, Mayor Gaynor’s staff designated Titanic disaster relief fund, presidential politics, and welfare, as some of the subject files. And under Mayor Hylan, who served from 1918 to 1926, movies, prohibition, drug addiction, milk investigation, and immigration were designated as some of the subject files.

Subject files contain letters, reports, photographs, telegrams, and memoranda to and from the mayor, in both original and carbon copy format. The correspondents tend to be other high level officials, business leaders, and/or prominent citizens. This series is arranged alphabetically by subject.

The departmental series consists of correspondence to and from the mayor’s office and each unit of city government, including departments, agencies, authorities, as well as state and federal officials. Departmental files were generally maintained on a calendar year basis. They contain similar material as subject files, e.g. memoranda, telegrams, letters, reports, and photographs. Departmental files are arranged chronologically by year and thereunder alphabetically by department name.

Owen R. Lovejoy, General Secretary of the National Child Labor Committee, wrote Mayor McClellan in 1909, and urged appropriations for a variety of education initiatives so that children would “... leave school to enter the ranks of industry before t…

Owen R. Lovejoy, General Secretary of the National Child Labor Committee, wrote Mayor McClellan in 1909, and urged appropriations for a variety of education initiatives so that children would “... leave school to enter the ranks of industry before they are fit to do so.” Mayor McClellan Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

General correspondence consists of letters between the mayor and citizens, civic groups, and businesses on a wide range of topics. General correspondence is arranged chronologically by year and thereunder alphabetically by surname of correspondent.

An undated memo, found in the papers of Mayor Mitchel (1914-1917), provides a detailed list of strikebreakers, “who participate in most of the strikes occurring on the eastside from time to time.” The rundown included “Dopey Bennie--guerilla and lif…

An undated memo, found in the papers of Mayor Mitchel (1914-1917), provides a detailed list of strikebreakers, “who participate in most of the strikes occurring on the eastside from time to time.” The rundown included “Dopey Bennie--guerilla and lifetaker, and Big Nose Kelly--strike breaker--election guerilla.”  Page 1 of 2. Mayor Mitchel Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Strikebreakers, page 2 of 2.  Mayor Mitchel Collection.  NYC Municipal Archives.

Strikebreakers, page 2 of 2. Mayor Mitchel Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

Technological developments in the first years of the new century profoundly impacted commercial enterprise, patterns of mobility and residence, as well as social interaction. Trucks, automobiles, and electrified transit systems transformed the physical city.  The telephone and radio revolutionized communications. The new motion picture industry, which had its origins in New York, further enhanced the city's role as the center of popular entertainment.  

The records of the post-consolidation mayors preserved in the Municipal Archives are an essential resource. Future blogs will examine how mayoral records have continued to serve researchers documenting the events of a tumultuous century.   

New York City’s Earliest Mayors

New York City has a mayor-centric form of government. But it did not start out that way. In 1665, shortly after the English assumed control of the colony from the Dutch, governor Richard Nicolls appointed Thomas Willett as the first New York City mayor. 

Old City Hall, Wall Street.  Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, D. T. Valentine.  1847. NYC Municipal Library.

Old City Hall, Wall Street. Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, D. T. Valentine. 1847. NYC Municipal Library.

Over the next 150 years, the colonial governor, and then the governor of New York State, annually appointed the mayor. The early mayors sat on the Common Council and had limited powers. Beginning in 1820, the Common Council elected the mayors. In 1830, the mayor was given the power to veto decisions of the Council, of which he was no longer a member. The first direct election of the mayor took place in 1834 when Cornelius Van Wyck Lawrence defeated Gulian Verplanck, both descendants of Dutch colonists. 

As the city grew in population and complexity through the 19th century, so too did the relative importance of the mayoralty. The Municipal Archives’ mayoral papers collection mirrors this trajectory of the executive office in city government. Although the office of mayor dates to 1665, the first collection of mayoral papers consists of exactly two thin folders of documents from the office of Mayor Philip Hone (1826-27). By contrast, the Common Council papers from that same time period totals more than 13 cubic feet. 

Request for Hand Cart License, by William Madden, submitted to Mayor Philip Hone, May 20, 1826. Mayor Philip Hone Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Application to Mayor Hone by James Maurice for appointment as Auctioneer for the City and County of New York, April 18, 1825. Mayor Philip Hone Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Mayoral collections from 1827 through 1848 similarly contain one or two folders of documents. One exception is Mayor Aaron Clark (1837-38). During his mayoralty the city experienced a yellow fever outbreak and his collection includes four folders of documents related to quarantining vessels landing in New York harbor.

Quarantine Report re: Schooner Exchange of N.Y., arriving from the City of San Domingo, on July 1st, 1837. Mayor Aaron Clark Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.  

Quarantine Report re: Schooner Mary Ann, arriving from Key West, on July 3rd, 1837.  Mayor Aaron Clark Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The collection of Mayor Caleb S. Woodhull, 1849-1851, although still miniscule (.25 cubic feet) in comparison to subsequent mayoral office holders, consists of eleven folders pertaining to the Commissioner of Emigration: Quarantine – Reports of Passengers, and two other folders related to emigrant boarding houses and runners.

Grant of License to Act as Emigrant Runner, to Charles Frederick Stiernfeld, by Mayor Caleb Woodhull, July 29, 1850. Mayor Caleb S. Woodhull Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Major public works such as the Croton Aqueduct (opened in 1842), the Central Park (opened in 1859), and the Brooklyn Bridge (open in 1883), together with the need to maintain these and related infrastructure—water and sewer lines, utilities, streets, parks, bridges, docks, etc. —led to the establishment of municipal departments. Recurring epidemics and the demand to protect public health led to creation of the Department of Health in 1866. The Department of Buildings, also established in 1866, came in response to advances in building technology that required regulations and oversight. The Department of Public Charities and Correction dates to 1860. And the growing population required more protective services—police and fire. This ever-increasing municipal work force and resulting opportunities for patronage enhanced the power executive office. 

Bridge No. VII, Central Park, Presentation Drawing, 1859. Department of Parks Drawings Collection,  NYC Municipal Archives.

Bridge No. VII, Central Park, Presentation Drawing, 1859. Department of Parks Drawings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Similarly, the volume and intellectual content of the mayoral collections grew during this period.  Mayor William Havemeyer (1873-74) and Mayor William H. Wickham (1875-76) both generated 12 cubic feet of records; the Abram S. Hewitt (1887-88) collection is 19 cubic feet and Mayor Hugh J. Grant (1889-92) tops out at 31 cubic feet. 

In theory, consolidation of the Greater City of New York in 1898 and the vast increase in the jurisdiction of the municipality should have cemented the mayor’s power. Although the mayor became the symbolic head of government, the newly created Offices of the Borough Presidents circumscribed the executive’s ability to control the city’s payroll. Other powers were shared with a strengthened Board of Estimate. But beginning with the mayoralty of Fiorello LaGuardia (1934-45), the powers of the executive began to overtake the other branches and to accrue the powers it enjoys until the present day.

Future blogs will examine the role of the mayor and how the Municipal Archives’ mayoral collections—each unique—reflect the time period and the individual who held the office.  

Proclamation by Mayor Opdyke, November 21, 1863. 

But before we leave our 19th century mayors, we will give one mayor, George Opdyke (1862-64), a special shout-out in recognition of the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday. In 1863, during the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln issued a proclamation fixing the national observation of Thanksgiving on the final Thursday in November, a move he hoped would help “heal the wounds of the nation.” In New York City, Mayor Opdyke issued his own Proclamation acknowledging the President’s designation of Thursday the 26th as a “…day of Thanksgiving and Prayer” and adding “…it becomes the duty of every good citizen to refrain from all secular employment on that day, and to devote it to appropriate religious exercises.” 

Wishing everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.  Look for our next blog on December 4.

We’ll Be Back!

We’ll Be Back!

New York is a destination city. In 2019, more than 66 million visitors from the United States and around the world enjoyed sights and venues throughout the city with maybe only a “sold out” notice spoiling their good times. Preliminary numbers for 2020 looked like it would be another record-breaker. That is, until 8 p.m., March 22nd, when Governor Andrew Cuomo put New York State on “pause,” closing all but essential businesses and requiring residents to “shelter-in-place.” Overnight, the city’s entire $70-billion tourism industry evaporated.

Brooklyn Bridge and the lower Manhattan skyline, ca. 1987. The iconic towers of the Brooklyn Bridge, one of the greatest public-works achievements of the 19th Century, has attracted photographers since completion in 1883. New York Convention and Vis…

Brooklyn Bridge and the lower Manhattan skyline, ca. 1987. The iconic towers of the Brooklyn Bridge, one of the greatest public-works achievements of the 19th Century, has attracted photographers since completion in 1883. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Times Square, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Times Square, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The current travel restrictions present an un-precedented and unique circumstance in New York City’s history. With the exception of a relatively short period after the attack on the World Trade Center in 2001, and the occasional blizzard or hurricane, visitors have enjoyed “the city that never sleeps,” without interruption.

New Yorkers are looking forward to the day when we will once again welcome friends and visitors to explore this great metropolis. In the meantime, we can ‘virtually’ visit some of the city’s most popular attractions as depicted in pictures commissioned by the New York Convention and Visitors Bureau in the mid-1980s. It is a small collection—only 52 transparencies—but their bright colors and iconic scenery showcase what the city has to offer. Although the pictures are not dated, based on signs and banners, it appears the bulk were taken in 1986 or 1987. 

Fifth Avenue entrance, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, ca. 1987. The Museum’s entrance steps have long served as a welcome respite for visitors and a prime location for people watching. The Museum is celebrating its 150th birthday in 2020. New York …

Fifth Avenue entrance, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, ca. 1987. The Museum’s entrance steps have long served as a welcome respite for visitors and a prime location for people watching. The Museum is celebrating its 150th birthday in 2020. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau. Collection. NYC Municipal Archives.

The New York Convention and Visitors Bureau created the photographs to illustrate their promotional materials. Formed in 1934 by merchants, hotel owners and other businesses to bring conventions to the city, the Bureau is a non-profit making entity. The Bureau and its companion organization, NYC & Company, are not city agencies, although they do receive budget support from tax-levy funds.

United Nations member flags welcome visitors to another popular city destination, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

United Nations member flags welcome visitors to another popular city destination, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The bronze sculpture of Prometheus at Rockefeller Center is a can’t miss midtown attraction, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The bronze sculpture of Prometheus at Rockefeller Center is a can’t miss midtown attraction, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Given the many enduring wonders of the city it would seem that the Bureau’s job would be easy. But there were times when promoting the city was a challenge. “Has New York's image unjustifiably soured, from Fun City to Crime City?” headlined a June 14, 1972, New York Times story about the Bureau’s launch of their annual “New York is a Summer Festival.” For the coronation of Ms. Bernadette Allen, the 19th-annual Summer Festival Queen that year, the Bureau hosted a gala event at one of the city’s premier tourist venues, the Empire State Building. They enlisted celebrities such as Duke Ellington and the “ageless” actress Gloria Swanson to preside over the festival. It is not entirely clear how Swanson’s remarks at the launch, as quoted in the Times, would help to promote tourism: “I chose to live in New York City in 1938 because I pay taxes here.” Perhaps the comment she added, “I’m the hostess with the mostest,” better served the cause. 

The Twin Towers dominate the pre-9/11 Lower Manhattan nighttime skyline, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

The Twin Towers dominate the pre-9/11 Lower Manhattan nighttime skyline, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Over the next several decades, the city experienced a renaissance and with it, tourism boomed. According to the Bureau, in 1977, more than 16 million tourists visited the city. By 1990, the figure climbed to 20 million, and surpassed 31 million by the end of the decade. After 9/11, tourism in the city gradually escalated up to 54 million in 2013. In 2019, the Bureau counted more than 66 million visitors—53.1 domestic travelers; and 13.5 arriving from overseas.

Taxis in Manhattan, ca. 1987. By the late 1980s, the Chevrolet Caprice had replaced the once-ubiquitous Checker Cab as the taxi of choice for fleet owners. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Taxis in Manhattan, ca. 1987. By the late 1980s, the Chevrolet Caprice had replaced the once-ubiquitous Checker Cab as the taxi of choice for fleet owners. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Antique auto in the Coney Island Boardwalk parade, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Antique auto in the Coney Island Boardwalk parade, ca. 1987. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Aqueduct Raceway in Queens, ca. 1987. The New York Convention and Visitors Bureau used their promotional materials to lure visitors to attractions outside Manhattan. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Aqueduct Raceway in Queens, ca. 1987. The New York Convention and Visitors Bureau used their promotional materials to lure visitors to attractions outside Manhattan. New York Convention and Visitors Bureau Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

In the Details

In the summer of 2018, I began work at the Municipal Archives as the lead archivist on the Manhattan Building Plans Project, a much-anticipated, years-long undertaking to process and rehouse more than 100,000 architectural drawings that had been filed with the Department of Buildings between 1866-1977. The drawings had been transferred to the Archives from the Department of Buildings in the aftermath of a less-than-successful microfilming project in the late 1970s. The microfilming vendor, believing the original material was going to be disposed of, haphazardly and messily re-wrapped the plans in acidic paper. They tightly tied each “bundle” with damaging twine and labelled with minimal, and often insufficient, identification.

Pre-processing storage conditions of the Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Post-processing (hooray!) storage conditions of the Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

My colleagues and I are processing and rehousing the plans to reestablish intellectual control over the material and to create more optimal retrieval and storage conditions. To do so, we un-roll the dusty bundles, identify the plans, sort, flatten, repair if damaged, count and catalog, carefully and neatly re-roll onto acid-free tubes, wrap with protective Mylar, and store in acid-free boxes.

We are organizing the plans according to BBL, or borough, block, and lot number, so that all the plans for all the buildings or structures built on a particular city lot, and all the changes and alterations made to an already existing building on that lot, are stored together. When sorting the plans, we verify the block and lot information and record it, as well as addresses, quantity of plans, dates, notes on architects, important features, and condition concerns. To date, we have processed and rehoused over 22,000 plans for buildings in lower Manhattan. They comprise all manner of architectural drawings—sections, elevations, floor plans, and details—as well as engineering and structural diagrams for every conceivable type of building—industrial, manufacturing, retail, financial, and residential. From stables to skyscrapers and everything in between.

Among the plans are obvious showstoppers, beautifully rendered elevations of well-known buildings splashed with color and architectural detail--what people think of when they think of historic New York City architecture. But most building plans are not that, and the vast majority of the tens of thousands of plans that we have viewed are far humbler and more mundane. They show alterations, fireproofing, elevator and boiler installations, signage, electrical work, and plumbing, plumbing and more plumbing. And they reveal a lot about the true nature of the building, the people who made and used it, and the city itself.

Wooden elevator shaft with dovetail detail, 129 Mercer Street, 1896. H.G. Knapp, architect. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

When you look through 22,411 plans of the details of New York City, day in, day out, what catches your jaded eye? What are the small things that delight or confound you and make you stop for a moment and show your colleagues or take a photo with your phone to refer to later or simply to show a friend? For me these stop-and-look-closer moments seem to fall into three different categories:

1.   The “Awww! Pretty!” Plans

Finding beauty in unexpected places has been one of the highlights of the project. To see the intricate parts of a building drawn in two dimensions provides a new perspective that gives you the ability to appreciate the complexity and precision of something as ubiquitous as a foundation or a column or a plumbing fixture in a brand-new way.

Surprisingly delicate rendering of a foundation pier for the Bowling Green Building, 11 Broadway, 1895. W. & G. Audsley, architects. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Complex column details from an 18-story loft building, 460 West 34th Street, 1927. Parker & Shaffer, engineers and industrial architects. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Two images showing the artistry of plumbing fixtures from two very different buildings. On the left is the plan for the barber shop basins at the former New York Life Insurance Building, 346 Broadway, 1895, McKim, Mead & White, architects.

And on the right a plumbing detail from the plans for the “City Prison” [aka the Manhattan House of Detention], 100 Centre Street, 1937, Harvey W. Corbett & Charles B. Meyers, architects. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

2.   The “Wait, what?” Plans

We process so many plans that you can’t take too much time perusing every drawing. But when a confounding phrase or image is spotted, you can’t help but look a little closer and do a bit of research. You can’t just let the Coloramas, movie theater train cars, and doughnut computers of the world pass you by.

Colorama display detail from a plan entitled “Colorama Room Plans and Traverse Sections, New Bank Entrance,” The Bank for Savings, 280 Fourth Avenue [now 280 Park Avenue South], 1953. Alfred Hopkins and Associates, architect. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. Coloramas were spectacular 18-foot by 60-foot color transparencies created by Eastman Kodak and displayed on the east balcony in Grand Central Terminal from 1950-1990. Only 565 were ever made and a few were later cut down in size and displayed elsewhere, which seems to be the case here. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Plan for alterations to theater interior, 46 East 14th Street, 1906. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. In the early 1900s the area around 14th Street had many nickelodeons and theaters competing for business. The Brady-Grossman Company featured Hale’s Tours, where patrons sat in simulated Pullman cars and watched films of picturesque railroad routes as if they were travelling. The “tours” became more and more sophisticated, with panoramas, sound effects, and a rocking motion making it feel like the “train” was moving; this seems to be an early version of the attraction.

Plan entitled “Additional Steel Support of IBM Units” for the Doughnut Corp. of America, 45 West 36th Street, 1954. J. Gordon Carr, architect. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. The Doughnut Corporation of America was founded in 1920 primarily to sell doughnut-making machines to bakeries. They later expanded to manufacturing doughnut mixes for home use as well as running a chain of coffee shops. They also founded the National Dunking Association in 1931 to encourage doughnut-eating. So it is really not too surprising that such innovators were also early adopters of the most modern (but heavy) technology.

3.   The “That’s so cool!” Plans

There are some things that are just too fun not to pay attention to. Whether it’s a hand-drawn detail that shows a draftsman taking artistic liberties or a floor plan that proves New York City building façades could contain any and all sorts of interesting enterprises.

A charming drawing for Bear & Son clothing store near Union Square, 50 East 14th Street, date unknown. Note that the draftsman went to the trouble to write in “Bear’s Head” and “Cub’s Head” at the top. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Floorplan for the Julian Billiard Academy, 138 East 14th Street, circa 1933. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. This second-floor pool hall was owned by the same family for over 50 years and its closing in 1991 was felt by many New Yorkers to be a real blow for “old New York.”

Longitudinal section drawing for Ogden & Wallace Iron Warehouse, 583 Greenwich Street, 1893. John A. Hamilton, architect. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. Though many architectural drawings depict both exterior and interior elements, this is the only one we’ve seen with such a cozy (lit!) fireplace.

Alteration plan for Electric Lady Studios, 52-54 West 8th Street, 1969. Storyk Design, architect. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives. Soundproofing and vocal booth construction details for the recording studio built for Jimi Hendrix in 1970 and still in demand today. Very cool.

And I’ll close with one of the first drawings that caught my eye and is still one of my favorites It spans all three categories. It’s a beautiful drawing of a beautiful object, its history certainly deserves some further research, and the structure is a cool, and recognizable detail of New York City architecture.

Tank and tower drawing for House of Relief, 67-69 Hudson Street, 1912. Felber Engineering Works. Department of Buildings Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Like many New Yorkers, the Building Plans Team is telecommuting now, and the plans are waiting for our return. And with many tens of thousands of plans remaining, who knows what else we’ll find.

Official Mayoral Photographs

The photograph collections of the New York City Municipal Archives are deservedly well-known for their extensive documentation of the physical city—the buildings, streets, highways, bridges and parks. The 1940 and mid-1980s “tax” photograph collections are perhaps the best examples. But there are “people” pictures, too, most notably in the mayoral photograph collections.

Charitable organizations made sure to stop by City Hall to promote their good works. Entertainers Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis visited with Deputy Mayor Charles Horowitz on behalf of the Heart Fund. March 14, 1952. Official Mayoral Photo #724, NYC Municipal Archives.

The Municipal Archives has recently started scanning a collection known as the “Official Mayoral Photographs, 1951–1965.” The first image in the series dates from January 18, 1951—approximately two months after Vincent Impellitteri took office as mayor following a special election on November 7, 1950. Impellitteri was elected to complete the term of William O’Dwyer who had resigned on September 2, 1950. (In accordance with the succession rule in the City Charter, City Council President Impellitteri took over upon O’Dwyer’s resignation and served as acting mayor from September 2, to November 14, 1950.)

Children visiting City Hall were popular subjects for the official photographer. Deputy Mayor Charles Horowitz purchased a doughnut from Camp Fire Girls, March 12, 1951. Official Mayoral Photo #143, NYC Municipal Archives.

Mayor Impellitteri received tickets to the Press Photographers Ball from comedian Ed Wynn and June Wurster, “Queen of the Ball,” March 30, 1951. Official Mayoral Photo #212-03, NYC Municipal Archives.

The official photographer was apparently stationed in City Hall, or nearby, and was assigned to document every swearing-in ceremony, special event, and visitor. The bulk of the images are taken in the mayor’s office or other City Hall rooms. Photographs of people posing on the City Hall steps and plaza and in the Park are well-represented in the collection. The photographer also shot events at Gracie Mansion and made occasional forays to other venues such as the Municipal Building, or mid-town hotels for gala luncheons and dinners. The photographer used a 4x5 view camera and each image was numbered and captioned.

During the Cold War, City Hall frequently hosted displays of United States military readiness. Mayor Impellitteri ascended a scaffold to climb inside a U.S. Air Force FS-689-A fighter jet, May 19, 1951. Official Mayoral Photo #269-02, NYC Municipal Archives.

The “official mayoral photograph” collection serves as an almost daily photographic record of the Impelliteri administration. The official staff photographer tradition continued through Robert F. Wagner’s three terms as mayor, until December 30, 1965, his last day in office.

Champion boxer Joe Louis conferred with Mayor Impellitteri in City Hall, October 31, 1951. Official Mayoral Photo #505-1, NYC Municipal Archives. Official Mayoral Photo #505-1, NYC Municipal Archives.

Further research is needed to determine why Wagner’s successor, Mayor John V. Lindsay (1966-1973), discontinued the practice of having a staff photographer assigned to his office. The Municipal Archives does include a collection of Mayor Lindsay images, but they do not provide a detailed daily record of City Hall events. Similarly, the Abraham Beame (1974-1977) collection is an eclectic mix of photographs. It was not until Mayor Edward I. Koch took office on January 1, 1978, that City Hall would once again have a staff photographer assigned to document the daily activities of the mayor.

Scanning the estimated 10,000 images in the “Official Mayoral” collection has just started, but looking ahead to pictures from the Wagner administration finds the mayor with Cassius Clay in City Hall. Later known as Muhammad Ali, the gold-medal winning boxing champion had just returned from the Rome Olympic Games, September 9, 1960. Official Mayoral Photo #7577, NYC Municipal Archives.

The Official Mayoral photographs will be made available for research in the Archives gallery in batches as the scanning and metadata activities are completed. Look for highlights of the collection in future blogs.

Powered by Squarespace